The conversation we must be
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:56 am
Idea that lending a book is illegal is just wrong.”these publishers clearly intend this lawsuit . To have a chilling effect on controlled digital lending at a moment in time when . It can benefit digital learners the most. For students and educators, the 2020 fall semester . Will be unlike any other in recent history. From k-12 schools to universities, many institutions . Have already announced they will keep campuses closed or severely limit access to communal spaces .
And materials such as books because of public health concerns. . Having is: how will those students, instructors and researchers access information — from textbooks to . Primary sources? Unfortunately, four of the world’s largest book publishers seem intent on undermining both . Libraries’ missions and our attempts to keep educational systems operational during a global health crisis.Ten . Percent of the world’s population experience disabilities that impact their ability to read.
For these . Learners, digital books are a lifeline. The publishers’ lawsuit europe cell phone number list against the internet archive calls for . The destruction of more than a million digitized books.The publishers’ lawsuit does not stop at . Seeking to end the practice of controlled digital lending. These publishers call for the destruction . Of the 1.5 million digital books that internet archive makes available to our patrons. This . Form of digital book burning is unprecedented and unfairly disadvantages people with print disabilities.
For . The blind, ebooks are a lifeline, yet less than one in ten exists in accessible . Formats. Since 2010, internet archive has made our lending library available to the blind and . Print disabled community, in addition to sighted users. If the publishers are successful with their . Lawsuit, more than a million of those books would be deleted from the internet’s digital . Shelves forever.I call on the executives at hachette, harpercollins, wiley, and penguin random house to .
And materials such as books because of public health concerns. . Having is: how will those students, instructors and researchers access information — from textbooks to . Primary sources? Unfortunately, four of the world’s largest book publishers seem intent on undermining both . Libraries’ missions and our attempts to keep educational systems operational during a global health crisis.Ten . Percent of the world’s population experience disabilities that impact their ability to read.
For these . Learners, digital books are a lifeline. The publishers’ lawsuit europe cell phone number list against the internet archive calls for . The destruction of more than a million digitized books.The publishers’ lawsuit does not stop at . Seeking to end the practice of controlled digital lending. These publishers call for the destruction . Of the 1.5 million digital books that internet archive makes available to our patrons. This . Form of digital book burning is unprecedented and unfairly disadvantages people with print disabilities.
For . The blind, ebooks are a lifeline, yet less than one in ten exists in accessible . Formats. Since 2010, internet archive has made our lending library available to the blind and . Print disabled community, in addition to sighted users. If the publishers are successful with their . Lawsuit, more than a million of those books would be deleted from the internet’s digital . Shelves forever.I call on the executives at hachette, harpercollins, wiley, and penguin random house to .